Skip to the content

IMPACTS OF SUNSCREENS ON CORAL REEFS

FUNDED WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE GOVERNMENT OF SWEDEN

AND THE FONDATION POUR LA RECHERCHE SUR LA BIODIVERSITE

Down load report

SUMMARY

This document responds to Goal 3(5) of the International Coral Reef Initiative (ICRI) Plan of Action 2016-2018, which seeks to review issues relating to the impact of sunscreens on coral reefs.

(chemical) and/or inorganic (mineral) UV filters that absorb, reflect or scatter UV light. They also contain inactive ingredients such as antimicrobial preservatives, moisturisers and anti-oxidants. Sunscreen ingredients including chemical (benzophenone-3 and -4 (BP-3 or oxybenzone; BP-4), ethylhexyl methoxy cinnamate (EHMC), homosalate (HMS), 4-methylbenzylidene camphor (4-MBC), diethylamino hydroxybenzoyl hexyl benzoate (DHHB)) and mineral (titanium dioxide and zinc oxide) UV filters have been detected in coastal waters. UV filters reach coastal waters either directly as a consequence of washing off swimmers and/or indirectly from wastewater treatment plant effluents. Many of these components have also been found in marine biota including fish, molluscs and corals as well as in sediments. Where sunscreen components have been detected, concentrations are very variable. They are generally found at barely detectable levels of a few parts per trillion but much higher concentrations of over 1 part per million (ppm) have been reported in a few locations (e.g. 1.395 ppm BP-3 reported by Downs et al (2015) in the US Virgin Islands). A small number of studies have shown that sunscreen and certain individual components of sunscreen can have negative effects on corals and other marine organisms under certain circumstances. The chemical UV filter oxybenzone has been studied most intensively and the following effects have been described:

• Bleaching of coral fragments and coral cells from various species of hard coral. This effect is more pronounced at higher water temperatures.

• Induction of the lytic viral cycle in symbiotic zooxanthellae with latent infections. • Damage and deformation of coral larvae (planulae).

• Damage to coral DNA and to their reproductive success. To date, experiments have largely been undertaken exsitu and there are concerns that they may not properly reflect conditions on the reef, where pollutants could be rapidly dispersed and diluted. In general, concentrations of UV filters used in experimental work have been higher than likely to be encountered in the reef environment. Most experiments have also been of relatively short duration (12 or 24 hours). On the reef, while UV filters may be at lower concentrations, they can accumulate in organisms and sediment and thus become persistent, with largely unknown consequences. Research to date has also concentrated mainly on the effects of sunscreens and individual chemicals at subcellular, cellular and individual organism level, with very few studies of wider impacts. Further research is needed to better understand which ingredients are safe and which pose a realistic threat to marine ecosystems, in particular:

• Determining concentrations of different sunscreen components in the water column, sediment and biota, comparing locations that are heavily visited and/or affected by coastal run-off with those that are more remote. • Investigating the effects of sunscreen pollutants at reef community and ecosystem level. • Exploring links between organismal or cellular/ subcellular-level biomarkers that more easily allow the study of pharmaceutical effects on biodiversity/ community com

position and ecosystem functioning. • Investigating UV filter toxicity in relation to predicted warming and ocean acidification conditions. • Researching the extent and significance of bioconcentration and bio-accumulation of organic UV filters as well as the consequences of long-term, chronic exposure to sunscreen pollutants. • Studying the effects of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCP) mixtures to provide a more realistic picture of ecological risks posed by the use of these products. • Identifying those ingredients that are safe and those that pose a realistic threat to marine ecosystems. Considering the many stresses already faced by reefs and current concerns about the toxicity of certain components of sunscreens to corals, a proactive and precautionary approach to dealing with this issue may be required. Reducing the amount of harmful sunscreen components that reach the reef environment is a high priority and will require the involvement of governments, reef managers, divers, snorkelers and swimmers, and the tourism and pharmaceutical industries. The following measures are recommended: • Encouraging the manufacture of reef-friendly sunscreens. • Promoting the use of reef-friendly sunscreens and other methods of UV protection • Regulating the sale and use of sunscreens containing toxins • Exerting consumer pressure to encourage development and use of eco-friendly sunscreens • Introducing financial disincentives for manufacture and use of potentially damaging sunscreens 

 

About the author

Dr. Howard Dryden

Dr. Howard Dryden

Dr. Dryden has unique knowledge combination of biology, chemistry and technology and is the inventor of the activated, bio-resistant filter media AFM®. Dr. Dryden is one of the world`s leading experts in sustainable water treatment.

comments powered by Disqus

Wherever you are and wherever you live, there is no safe haven from the toxic wave of chemical pollution

Dr. Howard Dryden, CSO

Goes Foundation

3/2 Boroughloch Square

Clean Water Wave

The Meadows

Edinburgh

EH8 9NJ

Email. howard@goesfoundation.com